Suspension design
TTR9 懸吊系統設計方向
[name=撰寫人:吳汶桓/底盤組/7~9代][color=#d904ed] 以下內容根據TTR7、TTR8懸吊系統調整與TTR9懸吊系統設計經驗。 前情提要:這邊來說一下TTR9的設計理念 可以參考一下可悲專題(數值應該是錯的(因為後來有大聰明給我設計變更...),如果有說到相同的東西以這邊為準),主要會著重在補充後半段的設計,也就是專題沒寫到的
前言: 在進入具體設計流程前,需先釐清本年度設計變更的核心邏輯。本隊屬於成熟的持續開發型(Iterative Development)車隊,設計方向通常依據前代車輛的實測數據、賽道表現及調校反饋進行優化。然而,受限於過去幾年疫情導致的技術交接斷層,第 6 至 8 代的懸吊設計幾乎處於停滯狀態。 與此同時,隨著賽事趨勢從內燃機(IC)轉向電動車(EV),為了建構穩定的動力平台,車輛的整備重量與軸距均大幅增加,這使我們在車輛動態條件上處於先天劣勢。面對交接斷層與架構巨變的雙重挑戰,本年度的懸吊系統採取了「歸零重構」的策略,雖在各項參數上力求嚴謹,但仍不免有待完善之處,目標在於為新一代電車架構奠定穩固的基礎。
設計變更的原因與方向Issues Observed in Last Year's Suspension and Vehicle Dynamics
去年車懸吊跟車輛動態系統的問題和問題的原因:1. Inside Rear Wheel Lift During Trail Braking
在trailbraking時,觀察到內側後輪產生離地現象。The inside rear wheel was observed to lift off the ground during trail braking.
Root cause:
重心在錯誤的位置(靠前),所以在帶煞入彎時重心又向前且向外側輪轉移,因而導致內側後輪沒有正向力產生後輪離地現象
今年的設計目標與設計變更的原因:2. Poor Vehicle Dynamics Predictability
調整車輛重心位置Root causes:
調整方向:將重心位置靠後且降低最大化總抓地力:降低重心高度可直接減少負載轉移,利用輪胎非線性特性使四輪負荷更平均,提升彎道極限並解決重煞時後輪離地的問題
Suspension
提升操控穩定性:低重心能減輕煞車點頭(Dive)與加速抬頭(Squat),配合質量的集中化降低轉動慣量(Rolldatainertiacalculations&werePitchincompleteinertia),讓車輛在極限邊緣的收復與指向更加敏捷
Suspension parameters deviated from typical ranges without supporting validation data.
Suspension geometry designed for a different tire size was reused.
扎實的理論基礎與車輛動態的可預測性來源自好的數據流程推導與計算This caused excessive roll center (RC) movement during body roll.為避免8代懸吊的動態重蹈覆轍,我選擇重新建立一套懸吊數據計算流程
3. Front Wing Ground Contact Under Heavy Braking
Under heavy braking, the front wing made contact with the ground.
Root cause:
Design Objectives and Rationale for This Year
懸吊系統的設計流程:1. Optimization of Center of Gravity (CG)
Design Direction
Objectives
Maximize Total Tire Grip
Lower CG reduces load transfer:
Helps eliminate rear wheel lift during braking
Improve Stability and Control
Lower CG reduces:
Mass centralization reduces:
Result:
2. Establish a Robust Suspension Data Calculation Process
Predictable vehicle dynamics must be built on:
To avoid repeating previous design issues:
3. Reasonable Suspension Parameter Selection
Due to time constraints, advanced simulations were not conducted for the 9th generation car
Therefore:
4. Optimization of Suspension Kinematic Behavior
A predictable vehicle requires not only good parameter selection but also well-designed suspension kinematics.
Key Focus Areas
(1) Roll Center Movement
Vertical RC movement during roll should be minimized
Smaller RC displacement → smaller variation in CG–RC distance
Result:
(2) Camber Recovery
Key considerations:
Ideal: Outer wheel camber ≈ 0° at maximum roll
However:
Design target:
Final tuning:
(3) Anti-Geometry (Anti-Dive / Anti-Squat)
Purpose:
Control longitudinal load transfer effects
Reduce excessive pitch angle caused by:
(4) Motion Ratio (Installation Ratio) Curve
Heave Motion Ratio
Designed as progressive (non-linear) rather than linear
Reason:
Benefit:
Roll Motion Ratio
Must be:
Ensures:
5. Optimization of Stiffness-to-Weight Ratio of Suspension Components
Importance of Structural Stiffness
Higher stiffness reduces deviation between:
Improves:
Benefits of Reducing Total Vehicle Mass (Sprung + Unsprung)
Improved Power-to-Weight Ratio
Reduced Load Transfer
Benefits of Reducing Sprung Mass
Benefits of Reducing Unsprung Mass
Improved Mechanical Grip
Faster Dynamic Response
Suspension System Design Process
1.Vehicle parameter calculation and setup
I. Vehicle static parameter calculation and setup
- Vehicle overall layout adjustment and center of gravity calculation
II. Vehicle dynamic parameter calculation and setup
- Maximum G-forces and wheel loads during acceleration, braking, and cornering
- Wheel loads, roll moment, and roll moment distribution during steady-state cornering at the limit
2. Suspension system parameter calculation and setup
I. Vehicle dynamic characteristics parameter
- Total ground clearance
- Heave motion
- Roll motion
- Ride rate
- Wheel rate (Wheel center rate)
- Sprung mass natural frequency
- Unsprung mass natural frequency
- Body roll angle
- Roll gradient
- Roll rate
II. Suspension parameter setup
- Heave motion
- Heave spring rate
- Heave damping coefficient
- Heave installation ratio (motion ratio)
- Roll motion
- Roll spring rate
- Roll damping coefficient
- Roll installation ratio (motion ratio)
3.Suspension geometry design and optimization
I. Front view
- Scrub radius
- King pin inclination
- Roll camber recover
- Roll center movement
II. Side view
- Caster angle
- Caster trail (mechanical trail)
- Pitch angle
- Pitch center height
- Anti-geometry
- Anti-dive
- Anti-squat
- Anti-lift
III. Rocker system
- Heave installation ratio curve
- Roll installation ratio curve
4.Suspension component design and optimization
I. FEA- Stress analysis & Fatigue analysis II. Topology- Optimized stiffness-to-weight ratio III. Component lightweighting
5.3D print functional check & prototype
I. Interference check during actuation
6.Vehicle fabrication
7.Vehicle testing and theory validation
I. Functional Check
- Verified proper operation of steering, braking, and suspension systems
- Checked for interference and abnormal actuation in all mechanisms
II. Static Inspection
- Measured suspension geometry (camber, toe, ride height)
- Verified vehicle weight and weight distribution
- Inspected structural integrity and assembly quality
III. Dynamic Testing
- Conducted straight-line acceleration and braking tests
- Evaluated low-speed handling (skidpad / slalom)
- Assessed high-speed stability and steering response
IV. Data Acquisition & Analysis
- Collected data on vehicle speed, acceleration, steering angle, and damper travel
- Analyzed discrepancies between vehicle behavior and design targets
V. Feedback & Iteration
- Adjusted setup parameters (damping, weight distribution, tire pressure)
- Performed design modifications when necessary